Charles Vincent Sabba, artist and art world investigative reporter, inside the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum in Boston, Massachusetts.
Sunday, July 3, 2022
Charles Vincent Sabba’s Intro
Charles Vincent Sabba’s introduction filmed in the library of Salmagundi Club located at 47 5th Avenue, New York.
Articolo 9 Consulting’s Art World Reporting You Tube Channel
Articolo 9 Cosulting’s Art World Reporting YouTube Channel: Art World Investigative Journalism and Reporting. This is the investigative journalistic video channel of Articolo 9 Art Consultation. Here you can find daily news and important info on the protection of artistic and cultural patrimony, criminality in the global art market, and other signifcant areas such as art markets, exhibitions, artists and cultural events.
https://youtube.com/channel/UCaNGj_8xCYaR3p71fRwk3JQ
Thursday, April 21, 2022
Basquiat Portait in Basquiat Exhibition at NAHMAD Contrmporary, N.Y.
Brett as a Negro, acrylic on tiling glued on plywood, painted by Jean Michel Basqiuat in 1982, in the private collection of Brett De Palma.
Back in the early 1980s, the outstanding artist Brett De Palma ran in a circle of very creative friends from the Transavanguardia, such as Jean Michel Basquiat, Francesco Clemente, Sandro Chia and Enzo Cucchi, to name only a few. In 1982, The late Jean Michel Basquiat painted this portrait of Brett and wrote the title himself. Basquiat traded the painting with De Palma for one of his artworks. The painting is currently included in the exhibit: Jean Michel Basqiuat: Art and Objecthood which is at NAHMAD Contemporary until June 6, 2022. Of the portrait, De Palma states cheerfully: “Forty years later I find myself with myself. I haven’t changed a bit.”
NAHMAD Contemporary is located at 980 Madison Avenue, New York, third floor.
Saturday, April 16, 2022
William P. Youngworth III is Suing Netflix and TriBeCa Enterprises for $2,500,000 for defamation, emotional distress and loss of consortium.
William P. Youngworth III v. Netflix and TriBeCa Enterprises
William P. Youngworth III and his son, William P. Youngworth IV, are suing Netflix, TriBeCa Productions, the Barnicle Brothers, Inc. for $2,500,000 for defamation, emotional distress and loss of consortium. This civil action arises out of damages the Youngworths feel they received after the airing of the four-part documentary series based on the infamous art robbery that occurred at the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum in Boston on March 18, 1990 in which a Vermeer, several Rembrandts, a Manet, and drawings by Degas were stolen. This documentary film series, which is entitled This is a Robbery and first aired on April 7, 2021, has been very popular among Netflix’ subscribers, which amount to over 200 million globally. Mr. William Youngworth III believes he was wrongly misrepresented in episode 3 entitled We’ve Seen It” and states his reputation has been damaged both in his business dealings as well as his personal life. While Youngworth has had legal issues in his past, he points out that over the last two decades he has devoted his life to providing for his son and raising him well, has been an outstanding citizen in his community and has built a reputable and successful business trading in antiques.
In episode 3 of the series, ex-Boston Herald Reporter Thomas Mashberg labeled Youngworth a “petty criminal” and also stated authoritatively that he knew Youngworth stole art and antiques from a hoard of stolen art and antiques that he was safeguarding for Myles Connor while Connor was serving time in prison. Mashberg is quoted as saying
“…in talking to this guy (Youngworth) I realized that he at some point opened up Myles’ trailor and was basically selling off items without telling Myles”. Youngworth stated that Netflix aired the accusations in episode three freely without properly vetting Mashberg or his information, which Youngworth’s lawyers point out amount to unsubstantiated personal attacks against a private citizen.
In the We’ve Seen It episode, Tom Mashberg describes the events that occurred on the night of August 18, 1997 in which Youngworth drove him to Red Hook, Brooklyn and showed him Rembrandt’s painting Storm on the Sea of Galilee, which was one of the artworks stolen from the Gardner Museum. Mashberg wrote about this sighting in the now famous We’ve Seen It article in the Boston Herald. The authorities were not satisfied and refused to grant Youngworth full immunity to produce the paintings so Mashberg requested more “proof of life.” A manilla envelope arrived with photos of the stolen art. A highly respected Gardner Museum Trustee named Arnold Hiatt was convinced Youngworth was the key to the recovery of the stolen art.
Mr. Youngworth recently told me in an interview that Tom Mashberg claimed in an article that he wrote for the March 1998 issue of Vanity Fair that Youngworth was not present when he was transported to the Red Hook warehouse and shown the Rembrandt. Now Youngworth questions why Mashberg changed the story in the Netflix series and told the interviewer that Youngworth actually drove him to Brooklyn himself and handed the painting to him after retrieving it from a tube.
Thomas Mashberg also received a vile with paint chips that the Boston Herald had examined by an expert named Walter McCrone. McCrone stated that "the paint chips looked like something Rembrandt plain produced. It looked exactly like the paint layers and pigments that was produced in Holland at that time. Everything was just perfect for a Rembrandt paint layer.” The paint chips were next sent to the Gardner Museum and were examined under their experts’ microscopes. The Museum officials pointed out that they saw that the color in the chips had not been used in any of the Rembrandts that were stolen from the Gardner Museum. They stated that the chips may have been from the 17th century but the colors didn’t match the colors in the paintings, so they couldn’t be from their Rembrandts. But Youngworth insists that no one ever stated the paint chips were from the Rembrandts. Mashberg points out in the episode that the color was Red Lake Madder and that pigment was used in The Concert, the painting by Vermeer that was also stolen on March 18, 1990 from the Gardner Museum. The paint chips were re-examined in 2003 by a Vermeer expert named Hubert von Sonnenburg. Mr. Sonnenburg was the chairman of painting conservation at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York. Sonnenburg’s tests determined that the paint chips were an exact match for the Vermeer. In a CBS investigative reporting piece in 2015, F.B.I. Special Agent Kelly, who worked on the case out of the Boston F.B.I. Office for years, admits that the paint chips appear to be from the Vermeer.
This lawsuit, which has been filed in the Department of Trial Court in the Common Wealth of Massachusetts, is just another part of the thirty-two year long, and complicated, drama that is the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum art robbery saga.
View the CBS investigative reporting from 2015 in which F.B.I. Special Agent Kelly states that the paint chips appear to be from the Vermeer:
The Concert, Oil on canvas, by Johannes Vermeer. Property of the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum, Boston; current location is unknown.
Wednesday, March 16, 2022
Welcome to the Art. 9 Art Consultation Journalistic Blog.
Welcome to the Articolo 9 Art Consultation Journalistic blog. This news platform keeps its readers informed about current, significant art world news regarding cultural heritage protection, art theft and art crimes, art markets, art exhibitions and more. Frequent posts will be made on this blog media platform.
Occassionally, this art crimes investigative journalist team gathers. From left to right: Jill Rackmill, Charles Vincent Sabba, Brian Ross and William P. Youngworth III. This photo was taken at the New York Athletic Association located at 180 Central Park South, New York, N.Y.
*****************************************************************
We at Art.9 Art Consulting News have a mission to bring to our readers significant art world news and are dedicated to providing thoroughly vetted stories, writings and news that has been verified as true and reliable. We will discuss the art world and its operatives in a fair and impartial manner and will guard our reputations and honor in our reporting and work. In the State of New Jersey, a blogger is viewed as a legitimate journalist under the State's shield law and qualifies for the protections that the law provides. The judiciary considers whether or not that blogger has a connection to news media and whether his/her true purpose is to disseminate news. The judiciary also considers whether the blogger obtained his/her information through professional news gathering techniques and activities, such as talking to reliable sources, attending events, and the use of Open Public Records Acts and other similar methods used by news media organizations. The work product must prove newsworthy.
Our previous art crimes investigative journalist team. This photo was taken at Luciano's Ristorante, Rahway, New Jersey.
***********************************************************
The State of New Jersey first adopted a reporter's privilege in 1933 and today N.J.s news reporter privilege offers some of the strongest in the nation. The N.J. Supreme Court has ruled that "the legislative intent in adopting this statute ...as seeking to protect the confidential sources of the press as well as the information so obtained by reporters and other media representatives to the greatest extent permitted by the Constitution of the United States and that of New Jersey."The definition of reporter has been given a broad definition. Because of the strong nature of New Jersey's Reporter Privilege, reporters cannot be forced to give up their sources. Subpoenas are rarely served to reporters and they are swiftly withdrawn after the reporter's lawyer invokes the privilege in writing.
Part of our mission is to protect our sources identities. This responsibility will be maintained without exception.
Portraits of former ABC Primetime Anchor Brian Ross in conversation with Jill Rackmill. Oil on canvas, detail of larger painting, 2009, Charles Vincent Sabba Jr.
**********************************************************
Obviously, not all bloggers are considered mainstream media but journalists do blog and the protections they receive from the First Amendment and all of the various states and their supreme courts are the same as if they were reporting using traditional news platforms. There is no such thing as government licensing of journalists in the United States of America and now much of the mainstream media uses the world wide web to disseminate their news. Regarding the question of whether or not a blogger was journalist when they claim the reporter's privilege in court, the federal appellate court crafted a test that examined the blogger/journalist's intent and the work they are performing. "We hold that the individual claiming the privilege must demonstrate, through competent evidence, the intent to use material sought, gathered or received to disseminate information to the public and that such intent existed at the inception of the news gathering prossess." Kurt B. Opsahl is an attorney that represents the Electric Frontier Foundation, a non-profit organization that fights for the civil liberties of journalists who use the internet and other new technologies. Opsahl has stated in the past that the news media is changing and he feels it is necessary that bloggers who practice journalism should receive the protections of reporter's privilege. He was once quoted as saying "the democratization of media inherent in blogging allowing any individual with limited investment to get on that soapbox and speak to an audience of millions is adding great things to the public debate and it is critical to the free flow of information that this new form of media be able to promise confidentiality to their sources."
Portraits of investigative journalist Jill Rackmill in conversation with the late Harold Smith (fine art loss adjuster). Oil on canvas, detail of larger painting, 2009, Charles Vincent Sabba Jr.
Portraits of Billy Youngworth in conversation with Tom Mashberg, a former reporter for the Boston Herald. Oil on canvas, detail of larger painting, 2009, Charles Vincent Sabba Jr.
From left to right: Brian Ross, Charles Sabba and Jill Rackmill.
William P. Youngworth III and Brian Ross. This photo was taken at the New York Athletic Association located at 180 Central Park South, New York, N.Y.
William P. Youngworth with artist/ art loss consultant/ art world investigative journalist Charles Vincent Sabba Jr.
**********************************************************
Some of my earliest reporting was coverage of the Italian Government's legal fight to recovery the Euphronious Crater and the Morgantina Silver (these art treasures were returned to Italy, the Euphronious Crater in 2008 and the Morgantina silver in 2010). I authored and published numerous articles on art crime and cultural property protection in the newspaper America Oggi, N.Y. Italy, La Voce di New York and on the Roll Call blog page of Your Brush With the Law, to name only a few.
Manet's Chez Tortoni, Stolen From the Gardner Museum; fingerpainted in fingerprint ink on an official police fingerprint card that was tinted with burnt siena oil paint, 2004, by Charles Vincent Sabba Jr.
William P. Youngwoth and Brian Ross, who served as Chief Investigative Correspondent for ABC News until 2018. Brian joined the Law & Crime Network in 2018 as Chief Investigative Correspondant.
Friday, August 4, 2017
Glenn Miller’s Death: Government Cover Ups Are Not New
La Voce di New York
Glenn Miller’s Death: Government Cover Ups Are Not New
Big band musician, composer, and bandleader, Glenn Miller volunteered to serve in the U.S. Army but his plane mysteriously disappeared while flying over the Enhlish Channel.
by Charles Vincent Sabba Jr
A young Phillip Gluck while serving in the U.S. Armed Forces in England
On December 15, 1944, Miller departed England for Paris on a small, single-engined UC-64 Norseman that was being flown by a pilot named John Morgan. He was traveling with Lt. Col. Norman Baessell but the plane disappeared while flying over the English Channel and the government blamed it on bad weather and also an issue with the plane's carburetor. He was 40 years old.
Phillip Gluck is from our greatest generation. Phillip is a WWII veteran who was born in Perth Amboy, New Jersey. His brother, Nathan Gluck, was an accomplished artist and a close friend of Andy Warhol's (in fact, Nathan was Andy Warhol's studio assistant for twenty years). Phillip has three of Nathan's art works hanging in his apartment. Both Nathan and Phillip served the U.S.A. in WWII, Nathan was a Chaplain's assistant and served in the U.S. Army in the Pacific and Phillip served in the Army Air Force from 1942 through 1945 and was a munitions handler and was stationed at Alconbury, England.
Phillip told me: "I was fusing bombs. After the bombs were placed on the planes, I came along and put fuses on the nose and the tail of the bombs. A squadron of planes, maybe 8 to 10, would leave our base, meet up with squadrons from other bases and cross the English Channel and drop the bombs over their targets. They had to drop all of their bombs before they returned to England. Any planes with fused bombs were prohibited from landing on the bases because it was too dangerous. If they crashed while landing the whole area could blow up. So they had a designated area in the English Channel where they jettisoned any of their unused bombs prior to returning to base. All unused bombs were dropped in this designated area and there was a prohibition against private planes flying in the area."
When the famous band leader Glenn Miller was 38 years old, he was too old to be drafted, so he volunteered to serve in the U.S. Army and convinced them to let him lead an army band so he could entertain the troops. He quickly earned rank and eventually was promoted to major. He was transferred to the Army Air Forces. He was entertaining troops in France in 1944. On Dec 15, 1944, Miller departed England for Paris on a small, single-engined UC-64 Norseman that was being flown by a pilot named John Morgan. He was traveling with Lt. Col. Norman Baessell. The plane mysteriously disappeared while flying over the English Channel and the government blamed it on bad weather and also an issue with the plane's carburetor. Miller was posthumously awarded the Bronze Star Medal.
Listening to Phillip Gluck discuss his army years is very interesting, but especially when Phillip recounted a strange story of government tough guys who appear to have been involved in a huge government cover-up and scared the life out of him when he was a young, low raking serviceman. He is very frustrated that he was forced through fear tactics to keep quiet all these years and now feels he must get someone to listen to him. He recently attempted through his family members to inform the Glen Miller Archive but they wouldn't take him serious. About the cover-up, Phillip stated: "Photography was my hobby, so I always hung around the photo lab. One day, I was asked to to report to the photo lab because they needed someone there to process some film. I think the usual guy who worked there was on leave or something. A reconnaissance plane had just come back with film. The reconnaissance planes would come back and have their films processed and those prints would be swiftly transported to the 8th Airforce Headquarters at High Wycombe for analysis. The film was really good prints. They were 8 by 10 contact prints and I was using a special machine with 48 lights to make them. I had the red light on outside the room which means no one should enter because the film could get ruined if they opened the door, but in this case I was almost completely done. As I was standing next to the chromium plated drum, which puts the gloss on the film, two really scary, big tough guys barged in. They were government agents dressed in suits and they barged right in and took all of the film, prints and negatives. They told me in a very threatening matter 'You never saw these!' I was a kid, only 20 or 21 at the time, and I was scared out of my wit. They told me 'you never saw these photos' but I really did see them and can't forget them. At my age, I'm 95 years old, you forget small things in the distant past but something like this from your youth you never forget. I remember it vividly. The photos from the reconnaissance plane showed a bomber that was returning to our base dropping its bombs over the designated spot in the English channel, but right under the bomber was a small plane. That small plane shouldn't have been flying there. The bomber plane had many little bombs and it showered the small plane underneath it. A bomber can have a large bomb on it or it could be loaded with many small bombs. I think the small bombs were two hundred pounders. This plane jettisoned a whole load of small bombs on the smaller plane below it. The agents took everything. It all happened so fast. Not long after that, we all heard the news of Glenn Miller's plane disappearing. The government blamed it on a carburetor issue. But I knew it was his plane I saw in those photos. Why would they forcefully take all the photos and negatives and scare me into silence? Why would they lie? Back then they lied all the time. I guess they had to, we were at war. News of the war wasn't shared so easily like it is today."
Miller's plane was never found and he is still listed as missing in action. There is a log book of a 17 year old amateur plane spotter named Richard Anderson that surfaced years later that claims he saw Miller's plane in a different area then the restricted zone where bombers jettisoned their bombs on aborted missions. There are many different records and government findings that would dispel Phillip's claim, but logs, records and government findings in those years were easy to doctor up and manipulate. This isn't the first time this theory of RAF Lancasters returning from an aborted mission dropping their bombs on Miller's plane has been discussed, but as far as I know, it is the first time we have a living eye witness (of sorts, he saw photos). This is the first time we are hearing the testimony of a witness who experienced the fear associated with a government cover up. Was the plane that Phillip saw in the photos getting showered with bombs the same plane Glenn Miller was flying in? We can't be sure, but he is adamant there was a plane in those photos and that two government agents went to great lengths to eliminate any trace of evidence. Whether or not it was Miller's plane, it was a plane just the same; a plane with victims on board that disappeared without a trace. Phillip is certain of what he saw and is determined to share his experience with the world. He firmly believes the plane he saw in the photos was none other than the plane Glenn Miller was on and he feels it is time the truth is finally told. He has lived with this secret for 73 years now and the fact that he feels the government lied about it has eaten at his sense of justice for too long. We are living in an era of government intrigue and cover-ups, but obviously in our great Republic of the United States of America, intrigue and cover-up are not new to the political landscape.
Charles Vincent Sabba Jr
Charles Vincent Sabba Jr. is an artist who, in the past, has written articles about international art crimes and cultural property protection for US Italy and America Oggi.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
“Dr. No” the Nefarious Figure Who Commissions Art Thefts
“Dr. No” the Nefarious Figure Who Commissions Art Thefts: Fact or Fancy? https://lavocedinewyork.com/en/arts/2023/02/11/dr-no-the-nefarious...
-
The Artist Betty Tompkins: A story of Censorship, Repression of an Honest Artistic Voice, Jerry Saltz and Paintings of Heterosexual Interco... -
Please view our new trailer and PLEASE subscribe to our Youtube channel: Articolo 9 Consulting. We will be posting many new film shorts and...
-
Charles Vincent Sabba, artist and art world investigative reporter, inside the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum in Boston, Massachusetts.
